Warm-up · Inequality instincts
Answer each. For the true/false parts, find a counterexample if the statement is false.
(a) Solve .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Subtract 3 to get , then divide by . Dividing by a negative number reverses the inequality.
(b) Complete the square: .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, so the expression is always at least 2.
Why
, leaving . A square is never negative, so the minimum value is 2 at .
(c) True or false: if , then .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
False. For example , .
Why
but . The statement is true if .
(d) True or false: if , then .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
False. For example , .
Why
but . Both (c) and (d) are true under extra conditions, which are today’s properties.
Two tools and two layouts
Definition
The two tools.
Squares: for all real . In particular .
Key idea
Two layouts- Layout 1: , so .
- Layout 2: start from a true statement, for example , and rearrange.
Watch out
Never start from the result you are asked to prove, unless every step is reversible and marked .Example 1
Prove that for all real and , using each layout. When does equality hold?
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Layout 1: . Layout 2: . Equality holds if and only if .
Why
A square is zero only when what is inside it is zero, so . This result is used constantly in Lesson 6 and in HSC questions.
Example 2 · Squares are non-negative
(a) Prove that for .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Expand . The restriction is needed so that exists.
(b) Prove that for all real .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Subtract the right-hand side and recognise a perfect square.
(c) Prove that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
In words: the mean of the squares is at least the square of the mean. Use a common denominator of 4 before simplifying.
HSC practice · Squares are non-negative
2023 HSC Q12(b)Let and be real numbers with . By considering , show that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
. Since , divide both sides by it: .
Why
State that before dividing: it is non-negative and not zero. Dividing by a positive number keeps the inequality sign.
Properties of inequalities · Prove and use
For real . Each property can be proved from .
| Property | Why? |
|---|---|
| If , then | |
| If , then (and vice versa) | , as |
| , and when | |
| If and , then | |
| If and , then | |
| If and , then | |
| If and , then |
Warning
We cannot in general subtract or divide inequalities. Counterexample: and , but is not greater than . (Also does not give in general; the syllabus result is .)Example 3 · Using the properties
(a) Prove that if , then .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, a product of two positive numbers, so .
Why
because , and because both are positive.
(b) Prove that if , then .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, since .
Why
Combine over the common denominator . A non-negative numerator over a positive denominator is non-negative.
(c) Prove that for .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Group in pairs and factor out . Then and , so the product is non-negative.
HSC practice · Which property fails?
Adapted from 2021 HSC Q5Which statement is NOT true for all real numbers (in the domain of each function)?
A. B. C. D.
Show answerHide answer
Answer
D.
Why
Counterexample: , gives . The property holds only when are both positive (or both negative). A, B and C hold because and are increasing and is decreasing. (Options reworded from the paper.)
Example 4 · Using a given condition
Let and be positive real numbers with .
(a) Prove that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
(Example 2(b)), so .
Why
Square the condition , then use and divide by 4.
(b) Prove that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
By (a), , and subtracting a smaller number from 1 gives a larger result.
(c) Hence prove that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Expand, then use . Since , we have (taking reciprocals reverses the inequality).
Exam-style · Prove a result, then use it
Exam-style question in three parts.
(i) Prove that for all real and .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Layout 1 from Example 1.
(ii) Hence prove that for all real .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
Add , and to get . Halve both sides.
Why
Apply (i) three times, once to each pair of variables, then add the three inequalities.
(iii) Hence, or otherwise, show that if , then .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
, so .
Why
Square the condition, then replace by the smaller quantity using (ii). This is the syllabus idea of using previously obtained inequalities.
Exit ticket
(a) Prove that for all real .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
Complete the square. The square is at least 0, so the whole expression is at least 1.
(b) Given , prove that .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
.
Why
The numerator and the denominator , so the difference is positive.
Spot the flaw · Starting from the result
Spot the flawA student wrote this. Find the flaw, explain why it matters, then write a correct version.
Claim. for all real and .
1.
2.
3. , which is true. Hence .
Claim. for all real and .
1.
2.
3. , which is true. Hence .
Show answerHide answer
Answer
The flaw: the student starts from the statement to be proved and ends at something true. A true ending does not make the start true. Correct version: (Layout 2), or write between the lines.
Why
From , squaring gives , which is true, yet is false. Here every step happens to be reversible, so the argument can be rescued by writing or by reversing the order. Reversing fails when a step is not reversible, for example squaring both sides, or multiplying by something that may be negative or zero.